Subscribe
to
one of
Pat
Wiklund's
Electronic Newsletters
|
|
Articles
The
ROI of Executive Coaching
In today's
challenging business climate, every unnecessary perk is routinely
trimmed from corporate budgets. However, thousands of business owners,
managers, and professionals still retain their executive coaches
because they correctly view them not as personal perks but as corporate
benefits.
Coaching's popularity has long been fueled by anecdotal evidence of
effectiveness. Recent larger, and longer-term, studies have concluded
executive coaching not only facilitates the skills development that
aids the individual participants, but also makes a significant impact
on the overall organization.
Study participants reported numerous benefits derived from executive
coaching, including better working relationships with direct reports,
peers, and supervisors, higher job satisfaction, and less conflict
within their scope of responsibility.
Organizations noted increased productivity, quality, and organizational
strength. And, most important, they reported a significant return on
the dollars invested in the process.
Focus of Executive Coaching
Executive
coaching is typically requested when an executive needs to:
- Change
behaviors or skills to "fix it," (whatever "it"
may be).
- Develop
more effective ways of dealing with people or organizational
responsibilities.
- Clear
away "blind spots," (unnoticed or subtext personal issues
or behaviors that dramatically impact effectiveness).
- Nurture
the skills and perspective required for a new position or career
change.
When
Executives Need Fixing
Coaching
is often the intervention of choice when a talented executive has
either a behavioral or personal issue that negatively impacts their
effectiveness. In the privacy of the coaching relationship, issues can
be addressed, and resolutions explored and practiced, with the ongoing
feedback and guidance of an experienced coach.
Because the coaching transcends the line of command, many troubled
execs feel freer to identify and resolve the real issues they're
struggling with. As an outsider, the coach isn't as constrained when
delivering feedback, challenging a client to grow, or frankly outlining
the consequences of not changing.
On the other hand, when the issues are personal, many executives seek
coaching outside the organization, choosing to work with a professional
uniquely qualified to resolve personal issues against the background of
an organizational setting. Some of these coaches may be or have
been therapists or other mental health professionals allowing them
to use a client's personal history or dynamics to inform the process.
However, the work stays centered on coaching with regard to the
specific models, strategies, and approaches the executive can adopt to
increase personal and organizational effectiveness.
Two
major studies have shown that it is more effective and less expensive
for the organization to provide coaching to those executives who have
either become derailed or need to increase their vision.
Unfortunately not every struggling executive sees a need or believes in
the efficacy of individual coaching. Even with these reluctant clients,
a skilled coach can facilitate major growth. As the executive becomes
more comfortable, he or she will usually embrace the coaching
opportunity and attribute their heightened effectiveness to the
coaching relationship.
Properly done, coaching is seen by both client and coach as a
collaborative relationship that is non-threatening to the executive's
confidence or self-esteem. Self-efficacy seems to increase, not
decrease, as the formerly reluctant executive becomes more engaged.
The organization benefits because the cost of bringing a flawed, but
otherwise valuable, employee up to speed is significantly lower rather
than replacing him or her.
Developmental Coaching
Another focus for executive coaching preparing for a new position
or supporting career growth can call for the development of both
new competencies and a broader perspective.
In a
long-term study of coaching outcomes, a division of BP found
participants consistently improved performance, increased
potential-for-advancement ratings, and achieved 50 percent higher
salary increases than colleagues who had not participated in the
program.
Another
study of coaching outcomes with over 100 executives, primarily from
Fortune 1000 companies, reported similar results. Executives who
participated in coaching realized improvements in their working
relationships, better teamwork with a conflict reduction in their own
groups, greater job satisfaction, more personal job commitment, and
better client relationships.
Their
companies benefited from increased productivity, quality,
organizational strength, customer service, cost reductions, and
retention of executives who received coaching.
All of this led to higher bottom line profitability, while providing an
ROI in real dollars that was many times greater than the cost of the
coaching initiative.
Typically, executive coaching starts with addressing tactical issues,
analyzing the presenting complaint, and then often progresses to more
strategic issues. When the researchers looked at the impact of the
tactical versus strategic impact, their findings were startling.
A little more than half [58 percent] of the executives reported
significant impact on the business when the coaching focused on
tactical issues, while 100 percent of the participants who also
addressed strategic issues reported significant impact on the business.
Of the monetary benefits to the organization, 70 percent were delivered
by those executives who worked on the strategic issues.
If that's the great news, here's the downside. Less than half [43
percent] of the executives progressed past the tactical to consider and
work on strategic issues.
Granted, there may be some issues about generalizing the findings of
these studies to the coaching initiatives you are providing or
engaging. However, there are clear and obvious indications that
individual executive coaching can easily move past individual
initiative to a strategic business initiative.
When we set coaching expectations and outcomes that are in line with
the expectations and strategic needs of the organization including
moving through tactical to strategic issues the potency and
benefits of the coaching initiative can be realized throughout the
organization.
Resources
Birkeland,
S., Davis, B., Goff, M., Campbell, J., & Duke, C. (1997). AMOCO
individual coaching study. Unpublished research report, Personnel
Decisions International.
Minneapolis, MN.
A Practical Guide to Evaluating Coaching:
Translating State-of the-Art Techniques to the Real World
David B. Peterson and Kurt Kraiger in The Human Resources Program
Evaluation Handbook. Sage Publications, 2004
__________
Since 1986, Patricia Wiklund, Ph.D. has helped some of America's largest, and smallest, organizations resolve expensive and troublesome people problems and conflicts by
leveraging the strategic power of soft skills®. A former mental health professional, she is as comfortable on the front line, as on the shop floor, or in the corporate executive suite, and also works effectively in government and educational settings. Call her today at 415 641-5997, or email her at
pat@patwiklund.com to discuss how she can help you put your people and organizations back on track.
An electronic version of this article is available for reprinting or reposting. Please contact Dr. Pat Wiklund for permission to reprint, and to see if there is a royalty required for reprint. If permission is granted, we request a hard copy of the publication in which the article appears. We request you include Pat's bio at the end of the piece, along with
contact information, and preferably, a photo. Photos are available online at
http://www.patwiklund.com/speaking/index.shtml#photos
Back to Articles
List
|